|
diet and exercise, imac, fatty oils , sources, functional foods, trade, lose fat: lose weight and feel great with the delicious, conditions, cholesterol, abe simpson, nutrition, liquid, real estate, plump girl , big fat girls , fitness, military spending, plump latina , dietician, aged person, medicine, cooking hints,
|
From this pro-choicers perspective, there's no logical distinction between a reduction in Down syndrome births due to a "cure" and a reduction due to voluntary selective abortion. So if someone is appalled by the latter, but okay with the former, that suggests that they're not really against Down syndrome world being wiped out; they're just anti-abortion. Post world 4: Is Preventing Down Syndrome Ethical? View contentHide contentFuture Imperative asks "If world aborting an embryo, no matter how crippled, appalls you, how would you feel if you had the technology to cure that unborn child completely?" Suppose that in the future, scientists discover that trisomy 21 - the condition that leads to Down syndrome - is indirectly caused by a virus which effects one in every 1000 or so births. A program of inoculation wipes out the virus, and Down syndrome in the following generations no one is born with Down syndrome, ever. Is this genocide?
|
